07-23-2008, 03:15 PM | #1 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Oil speculation
Quote:
Guess who is fighting rolling back this legislation. |
|
07-23-2008, 03:21 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
I'm not taking Dorgan's word at face value. There's all kinds of ... ahem ... speculation at what percentage of oil futures is fueled by speculators, no pun intended.
And naturally Dorgan and NPR would trace the situation back to a bill created by Republicans. Who else is responsible for destroying America, right?
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
07-23-2008, 03:25 PM | #3 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
|
|
07-23-2008, 03:45 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
Republicans aren't right on every issue, just most issues. |
|
07-23-2008, 03:51 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
The reasons behind oil prices are complex and legion. Democrats have selected what they believe is a politically viable bogeyman, since their demonization of the oil industry appears not to have caught on.
No doubt speculation has contributed to the problem, but their "solution"--clamping down--is a band-aid at best. It's smoke and mirrors. There is global concern that supply can keep up with demand, and as long as that's true, prices will float at a place where the market is comfortable, be it $140/barrel or whatever.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
07-23-2008, 03:55 PM | #6 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
GOP is really making the wrong move here. What has gotten BETTER after ANYONE can buy futures contracts? That's what the GOP has to sell. Except they are arguing "we don't think it has made a difference." Well, if it hasn't made a difference, THEN THERE ISN'T MUCH DOWNSIDE TO ROLLING IT BACK! |
|
07-23-2008, 03:59 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
And from a political perspective, this is almost certainly a loser. The public at large does not pay attention to what futures markets are, nor do I think they are likely to buy the line that killing speculation will be the silver bullet toward lowering prices. It takes about a 5th grade education to understand supply and demand.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
07-23-2008, 04:07 PM | #8 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
Yet he has been duped into believing that supporting these people is in his best interest. |
|
07-23-2008, 04:09 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
People talk about the need for hedging, OK fine, let those people who are legitimately in the business or a related business do the hedging. Not huge hedge funds whose sole purpose is to specualte on where a commodity is going to go. The liquidity argument is bogus. The liquidity is so tons of trades will go on and not only the speculators make (and lose), but the people who run the exchanges make a ton of money. |
|
07-23-2008, 04:15 PM | #10 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|