cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2010, 10:27 PM   #1
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Filet Mignon for everybody?

If you did not have to pay for health care but could choose, where would you choose to get health care?

I would choose for many things one of the Mayo Clinics. Of course, I suppose there are specialty issues where another clinic has more expertise.

Cali and his ilk liberally construe an election without special vote-ins to be a mandate for anything the candidate promised during the election cycle, hence the immensely popular but ambiguous liberal promise of filet-mignon for everybody. I fundamentally disagree that being elected gives a politician a mandate but rather just means the electorate hated the victor less than the loser and the victor should walk carefully in whatever the victor does, but that's the arrogance of elected officials.

Coverage from the best system in the world, despite liberal naysayers requires us to give filet mignon for all for free. We can't afford it.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 10:42 PM   #2
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
If you did not have to pay for health care but could choose, where would you choose to get health care?

I would choose for many things one of the Mayo Clinics. Of course, I suppose there are specialty issues where another clinic has more expertise.

Cali and his ilk liberally construe an election without special vote-ins to be a mandate for anything the candidate promised during the election cycle, hence the immensely popular but ambiguous liberal promise of filet-mignon for everybody. I fundamentally disagree that being elected gives a politician a mandate but rather just means the electorate hated the victor less than the loser and the victor should walk carefully in whatever the victor does, but that's the arrogance of elected officials.

Coverage from the best system in the world, despite liberal naysayers requires us to give filet mignon for all for free. We can't afford it.
So the November 2008 elections were not a mandate, the 5 congressional races since (where Dems went 4-1) were not a mandate, but VA, NJ and MA were. Really?
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 11:03 PM   #3
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
So the November 2008 elections were not a mandate, the 5 congressional races since (where Dems went 4-1) were not a mandate, but VA, NJ and MA were. Really?
There is no such thing as a mandate unless it is by plebiscite.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.