Palin "clueless"

[TripletDaddy]

Originally Posted by Indy Coug

If Romney were the VP candidate, they could parlay that into a strength in light of the current economic turmoil and Romney's record of corporate turnarounds.

I bet McCain is wishing he could get a mulligan on his VP pick....had he picked Romney, the Rep ticket would have the ONLY candidate truly qualified to discuss the economy.

And he could be going on the OFFENSIVE about the economy. As it stands, McCain has to pray that nobody brings it up.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

I bet McCain is wishing he could get a mulligan on his VP pick....had he picked Romney, the Rep ticket would have the ONLY candidate truly qualified to discuss the economy.

And he could be going on the OFFENSIVE about the economy. As it stands, McCain has to pray that nobody brings it up.

Huh? Are we talking about anything else?

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

Hm, so you go with misdirection on the hypothetical. That isn't stellar- exute does that all the time.

Do you want a mulligan?

I'm not the one with thread A.D.D.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

THAT's what you go with on the mulligan?

Looks like I overestimated you.

I leave you now with this wonderful exchange:

MCCAIN: Senator Obama is the chairperson of a committee that oversights NATO that's in Afghanistan. To this day, he has never had a hearing. I mean, it's remarkable.

OBAMA: Look, I'm very proud of my vice presidential selection, Joe Biden, who is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and as he explains, and as John well knows, the issues of Afghanistan, the issues of Iraq, critical issues like that, don't go through my subcommittee because they're done as a committee as a whole.

"I never held a hearing because I'm proud of my VP pick." Hello, non sequitur.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

You need to brush up on reading comprehension again. McCain attacked Obama for failing to hold hearings on Afghanistan. Obama pointed out that Afghanistan issues don't go through his subcommittee (as McCain knows). They go through Biden's committee (and Biden has held hearings).

Probably too complex for you to get it.

Simplified: you are wrong.

His subcommittee oversights NATO, which currently has troops deployed in Afghanistan, as McCain clearly stated. It's cute of Obama to blame this on his VP, but it's his own fault for holding no hearings.

Of course, Obama gets confused about which committee he's even on.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

See my post above, as it has already answered your silly claims.

In other words, Obama voted "present" yet again. Just like he's doing on the bailout bill.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

The House voted today. Obama is in the Senate.

And still not a single hearing. Too busy garnering "executive experience" running for President.

Perhaps if he loses, he could just keep on running. By 2008 he could claim 6 years of executive experience.

[UteStar]

Palin clueless? That is ridiculous. With our relationship on the rocks with Russia, it is comforting to have someone that has been on our first line of defense and knows Russia intimately. If Russia decides to send their troops to attack Alaska, we have someone that can handle that.

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

You are getting a bit hysterical now. You tend to slip into your Hannity talking points when you run out of things to say.

I think Hannity may be on now. Turn it on so you can at least update your message.

You started the thread off with Ed Shultz talking points. At least Hannity has an audience.