05-16-2016, 06:30 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Hillary: Bill to Be in Charge of Economic Revitalization
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/16/news...inkId=24545184
Great. News. Bring back the high-octane growth years of Bill Clinton.
__________________
太初有道 |
05-16-2016, 06:59 PM | #2 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
05-16-2016, 07:15 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
It was only partially a bubble. Most of it was real and due to productivity growth. Bringing the deficit down and gaining the confidence of Wall Street.
__________________
太初有道 |
05-16-2016, 07:34 PM | #4 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
|
Hillary won't ever be president.
|
05-16-2016, 08:20 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Then who's gonna be president?
__________________
太初有道 |
05-16-2016, 10:41 PM | #6 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
|
trump
|
05-17-2016, 01:59 AM | #7 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
He "brought" down the deficit by acceding to some of the demands of Republicans, and raising taxes to exorbitant levels. You give Bill far too much credit. Structurally, he did not set into place policies that benefited the economy.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
05-17-2016, 01:05 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
Studies have shown the rich people's labor supply is insensitive to changes in the tax code. So to raise their rates to 39% is consonant with empirical findings. And lo and behold, it worked amazingly well, as the economy chugged along. Innovation surged from the birth of the internet. Clinton's policies worked spectacularly. And yes, you are correct and ceding to Republican demands. Clinton had credibility to ask Republicans forgo tax cuts for the rich because he gave up liberal demands for more infrastructure spending. Like Alan Greenspan, who is a libertarian, said, Clinton created a deficit-cutting competition between Democrats and Republicans. Those days are long gone. But he didn't cede to ALL Republican demands. The original GOP version of the welfare reform bill didn't provide child care, which mothers need in order to work. The GOP bill would've been a disaster. The final one Clinton signed still had a few draconian GOP provisions in it, but it was workable. Republicans just want to throw widows and poor people out onto the street so they can starve, while Clinton wanted them to find work and become self-sufficient. And then Bush comes in and blows the deficit out of control again, just like Reagan did. Even this year, every Republican candidate (except possibly Kasich) had irresponsible budget plans. Hillary might be corrupt, but she is the only one able to bring back the Clinton years.
__________________
太初有道 |
|
05-17-2016, 01:06 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
During the Clinton years, every decile of Americans, from the bottom 10% to the top 10%, saw their incomes grow. Demand for jobs was so high that even the most racist managers had to hire women, minorities, and disabled people.
__________________
太初有道 |
05-17-2016, 03:15 PM | #10 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Hillary doesn't have the ability to get along with the GOP.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
Bookmarks |
|
|