StickIt's History - cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

ewth8tr · 07-18-2006, 09:42 PM

lol, unfortunately, it's a guy who calls himself Stick It In Him and appeals cougarboard suspensions by asking Jefe to lick his balls :-p

mpfunk · 07-18-2006, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ewth8tr

lol, unfortunately, it's a guy who calls himself Stick It In Him and appeals cougarboard suspensions by asking Jefe to lick his balls :-p

Did he win the appeal?

Archaea · 07-18-2006, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpfunk

Did he win the appeal?

Or did Jefe follow through? That might be an honor code violation. Now if he had requested his butt, that might be appropriate at the honor code office itself.

Colly Wolly · 07-18-2006, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpfunk

Did he win the appeal?

No. I have a lifetime ban from cougarboard. This place is better anyways.

ewth8tr · 07-18-2006, 09:52 PM

I think so, instead of it being a lifetime penalty, he will be able to start posting again on October 2, 2105 at 12:09am

ute4ever · 07-18-2006, 10:18 PM

Dang! I spend two hours on the phone with my girlfriend, and look at what I missed out on here.

Fus, of course Alma had the authority to baptize. Simply put, if he was merely swimming in his personal rameumptum, Mormon would not have included it in his abridgement. Of course there are clues that would indicate Alma didn't have the priesthood, e.g. 'why would several generations of wicked priests care about passing it on,' however there are also clues that would indicate that he did have it, such as his very being a priest.

And everything the modern gospel teaches points to the latter view.

ute4ever · 07-18-2006, 10:25 PM

And forgive me for pointing out the obvious, but it's these grey-area details that fuel the anti-mormon literature.

SeattleUte · 07-18-2006, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stick It In Him

No. I have a lifetime ban from cougarboard. This place is better anyways.

Funny, some people here have lifetimes bans from CB who seem like they should fit in better over there than I do.

jay santos · 07-18-2006, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stick It In Him

No. I have a lifetime ban from cougarboard. This place is better anyways.

SIIM, we're kindred spirits. I also received lifetime ban for mouth-to-body-part invitation in a CB appeal.

Mine was for the Moderation council to kiss my ass.

Who was the original? Mine occurred in Nov/Dec 2004.

RockyBalboa · 07-18-2006, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ewth8tr

I wish you all the best in finding whatever you are looking for, but I don't agree with you on this issue and have no desire to argue about it. I believe the the Priesthood is the true power of god and not just love. I am far from a mullah, but I'm offended that you continue to go to the Temple when based on your statements here, you obviously are not a worthy recommend holder. I know I am going to get shit for it, but I contend that if you revealed to any Church authority, from President Hinckley on down to your Bishop, what you are saying here that you truly believe, that they would take away your Recommend. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but those are my true feelings. Please don't take this as an attack on you personally or anything like that, because it is not meant to be. I respect your right to believe/worship according to your conscience, but I believe that the Temple is a sacred place and that your beliefs are not in line with Church Docterine and can't agree with you using the temple ceremonies for your own beliefs that are not in line with the churches.

I can't improve upon that. Well said.

07-18-2006, 09:42 PM	#1
ewth8tr Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: South Salt Lake, Utah Posts: 1,742	lol, unfortunately, it's a guy who calls himself Stick It In Him and appeals cougarboard suspensions by asking Jefe to lick his balls :-p

07-18-2006, 09:52 PM	#5
ewth8tr Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: South Salt Lake, Utah Posts: 1,742	I think so, instead of it being a lifetime penalty, he will be able to start posting again on October 2, 2105 at 12:09am

07-18-2006, 10:18 PM	#6
ute4ever I must not tell lies Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 5,103	Dang! I spend two hours on the phone with my girlfriend, and look at what I missed out on here. Fus, of course Alma had the authority to baptize. Simply put, if he was merely swimming in his personal rameumptum, Mormon would not have included it in his abridgement. Of course there are clues that would indicate Alma didn't have the priesthood, e.g. 'why would several generations of wicked priests care about passing it on,' however there are also clues that would indicate that he did have it, such as his very being a priest. And everything the modern gospel teaches points to the latter view.

07-18-2006, 10:25 PM	#7
ute4ever I must not tell lies Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 5,103	And forgive me for pointing out the obvious, but it's these grey-area details that fuel the anti-mormon literature.