06-16-2008, 01:55 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Monsanto
Posts: 3,085
|
Alma's Theology
In Alma 7:12-13 you have:
12 And he will take upon him death, that he may loose the bands of death which bind his people; and he will take upon him their infirmities, that his bowels may be filled with mercy, according to the flesh, that he may know according to the flesh how to succor his people according to their infirmities. 13 Now the Spirit knoweth all things; nevertheless the Son of God suffereth according to the flesh that he might take upon him the sins of his people, that he might blot out their transgressions according to the power of his deliverance; and now behold, this is the testimony which is in me. So... The Son becomes mortal so he may know how to succor his people, but the Spirit knows all things. and then a little backpedaling beginning with "nevertheless?"
__________________
"Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; " 1 Thess. 5:21 (NRSV) We all trust our own unorthodoxies. |
06-16-2008, 02:13 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
|
Quote:
__________________
Its all about the suit |
|
06-16-2008, 06:59 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Quote:
On the other hand, if Alma's view of God is modal (don't impute a lot of theological precision to my use of the word) then Alma might not be backpedaling at all. |
|
06-16-2008, 07:23 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
How would Christ know all things if He had never had a physical body prior to coming to earth?
|
06-16-2008, 07:30 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Quote:
Now if you want to argue that the phrase "knoweth all things" is limited in some sense and that we should not impute theological precision then I am fine with that. I don't think the Book of Mormon is theologically precise. Maybe "all things" just refers to how, why, and when events or things happen and not a knowledge of "how to succor people" which such knowledge of succoring may require a physical body to learn. I view this as a possible reading; its what I mean by the "modal" stuff. I would have to look over the sermon more careful to see if I think such as reading can be dismissed. Last edited by pelagius; 06-16-2008 at 07:45 PM. |
|
06-16-2008, 07:38 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
You're right. Craig Blomberg explained this in How Wide the Divide? In spite of Jesus' omnipotence there was experiential knowledge he still had to acquire through the incarnation. Alma's not backpedaling.
__________________
太初有道 |
06-16-2008, 07:42 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Chino, I am going to have to part ways a little bit. Indy may be right, but its not obvious that he is right. It depends what Alma means by the phrase "Knoweth All Things." Make a case from Alma that he didn't include experiential knowledge in "knoweth all things." If you can show that from Alma, then Indy is right. It matters not what Bloomberg says (unless, of course, Bloomberg was doing exegesis on Alma 7 and finds evidence that Alma doesn't include experiential knowledge in the phrase "Knoweth All Things" -- Remember, SIEQ's original post is about Alma's theology or what we can figure out about Alma's theology not necessarily what is the correct or true theological position), it matters what Alma meant (which may or may not be recoverable).
Last edited by pelagius; 06-16-2008 at 08:07 PM. |
06-16-2008, 07:49 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Is it also possible Alma was simply speaking metaphorically? Could he have been using an expression to help those he was teaching identify with God, his passions, motivations, etc., and not really teaching about the nature of God himself?
More interestingly: was Christ's ability to succor his people more effective after his death and resurrection than before? |
06-16-2008, 08:20 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
What would make this question even more interesting is if it turned out perfected beings are not constrained by our understanding of space and time.
|
06-16-2008, 09:26 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
__________________
太初有道 Last edited by ChinoCoug; 06-16-2008 at 09:35 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|