cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Other College Sports
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2008, 08:30 PM   #1
Judge Smails
Junior Member
 
Judge Smails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 211
Judge Smails is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exUte View Post
are stupid enough to go to the stake president to try and overrule? They surely knew what the bishop would have told the stake president.

I tend to believe the kid. I think it was a power struggle between the two.
Under my hypothesis, the kid told his father it was for church attendance, and the bishop and stake president wouldn't tell the father otherwise due to confidentiality. In that scenario, the father isn't lying to the newspaper. He's telling them what he's been told by his son. If you think about it, it makes a lot of sense.

Again, I'm not even suggesting my hypothesis is correct. You could be right about it just being a power struggle. Without knowing anything about the story, I'm going to lean towards the bishop's discretion. Bishops are human, they are all different, and they certainly make errors, but I just can't fathom there is a bishop out there with such poor judgment as to have made the determination that the father has outlined.

It didn't happen that way...whatever happened.
__________________
Oh yes, I have spread my seed.
Judge Smails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 08:39 PM   #2
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Smails View Post
Under my hypothesis, the kid told his father it was for church attendance, and the bishop and stake president wouldn't tell the father otherwise due to confidentiality. In that scenario, the father isn't lying to the newspaper. He's telling them what he's been told by his son. If you think about it, it makes a lot of sense.

Again, I'm not even suggesting my hypothesis is correct. You could be right about it just being a power struggle. Without knowing anything about the story, I'm going to lean towards the bishop's discretion. Bishops are human, they are all different, and they certainly make errors, but I just can't fathom there is a bishop out there with such poor judgment as to have made the determination that the father has outlined.

It didn't happen that way...whatever happened.
Non-disclosable sources now verify it is simply a power struggle. The kid lost and the bishop won.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 08:47 PM   #3
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Non-disclosable sources now verify it is simply a power struggle. The kid lost and the bishop won.
How do you know those sources are telling the truth. How do we know they are being objective. Those sources could be lieing.

Perhaps the source you are talking about has a daughter that had improper relationships with the kid.

When it gets down to it, no one should make any judgement on this until the Bishop and the Stake President make a clear and definitive statement.

Until then believe nothing, except that priesthood leaders are to be followed and not questioned.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 08:56 PM   #4
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
How do you know those sources are telling the truth. How do we know they are being objective. Those sources could be lieing.

Perhaps the source you are talking about has a daughter that had improper relationships with the kid.

When it gets down to it, no one should make any judgement on this until the Bishop and the Stake President make a clear and definitive statement.

Until then believe nothing, except that priesthood leaders are to be followed and not questioned.
Well, according to smails, the kid is probably selling his soul on craig'slist while running the Hillary for President campaign out of his closet.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:09 PM   #5
Judge Smails
Junior Member
 
Judge Smails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 211
Judge Smails is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
Non-disclosable sources now verify it is simply a power struggle. The kid lost and the bishop won.
Non-dislosable sources. Damn! I stand corrected.

May the athlete who plays a sport I don't care about, with a name I had never heard before, that I can't remember now, that I don't wish to even take the time to look up again, be added to the martyr list somewhere between Stephen and Hyrum Smith.

I have sources who've verified Bronco Mendenhall is one of the 3 Nephites. No, I can't disclose who's told me that, but I believe them.

What exactly would your non-disclosable source find out about the situation? Did they give the Bishop truth serum on a scout overnighter?

Confidentiality will keep the other side of the story from ever being told.

I also probably ought to break the news to you - racist LA cops didn't plant the bloody glove.
__________________
Oh yes, I have spread my seed.
Judge Smails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:11 PM   #6
Judge Smails
Junior Member
 
Judge Smails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 211
Judge Smails is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Smails View Post

May the athlete who plays a sport I don't care about.
I do wonder how I'd react if this happened to a key football/basketball player. I probably would be sober enough to realize they weren't kicked out for church attendance, but I may have kept that opinion to myself in hopes I was wrong.
__________________
Oh yes, I have spread my seed.
Judge Smails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:15 PM   #7
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Smails View Post
I do wonder how I'd react if this happened to a key football/basketball player. I probably would be sober enough to realize they weren't kicked out for church attendance, but I may have kept that opinion to myself in hopes I was wrong.
Depends on the player. Walk on return missionary, gone.

Hall or Cummard, good luck Bishop on getting them booted. That fact probably pisses some Bishops off.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:17 PM   #8
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Smails View Post
Non-dislosable sources. Damn! I stand corrected.

May the athlete who plays a sport I don't care about, with a name I had never heard before, that I can't remember now, that I don't wish to even take the time to look up again, be added to the martyr list somewhere between Stephen and Hyrum Smith.

I have sources who've verified Bronco Mendenhall is one of the 3 Nephites. No, I can't disclose who's told me that, but I believe them.

What exactly would your non-disclosable source find out about the situation? Did they give the Bishop truth serum on a scout overnighter?

Confidentiality will keep the other side of the story from ever being told.

I also probably ought to break the news to you - racist LA cops didn't plant the bloody glove.
We here at CG have means and ways of verifying things which you little people don't. We now can state with reasonable authority that the bishop was out of line.

Nondisclosable means we won't disclose to YOU. We're certain that you are now more comfortable and can go back to the place from whence you came.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:29 PM   #9
Judge Smails
Junior Member
 
Judge Smails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 211
Judge Smails is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post
We here at CG have means and ways of verifying things which you little people don't.

Nondisclosable means we won't disclose to YOU.
The funny thing is I believe you think that's true.
__________________
Oh yes, I have spread my seed.
Judge Smails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:34 PM   #10
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Smails View Post
The funny thing is I believe you think that's true.
You wish it weren't.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.