John McCain invented the Blackberry? - Page 3 - cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

TripletDaddy · 09-17-2008, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarbaraGordon

On the contrary, that's why Mike's trolling is so ineffective. He's all over the map in his posts, so it's too obvious that he's trolling. Everybody knows he doesn't believe anything he says.

On the other end of the spectrum, you've got Seattle who's so consistently the hyper-intellectual Mormon-hater, or TDaddy, consistently the condescending moneybags bigtime football lover, or even Cali, the kool-aid drinking Democrat. They keep their personas and trolling bait consistent and are consequently much more believable and effective.

where is this moneybags thing coming from?

Find me a post where I talk about my salary.

The condescending part, no problem. But the moneybags thing is going too far.

creekster · 09-17-2008, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

where is this moneybags thing coming from?

Find me a post where I talk about my salary.

The condescending part, no problem. But the moneybags thing is going too far.

Triplet, old friend, . . .

TripletDaddy · 09-17-2008, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by creekster

Triplet, old friend, . . .

Sass-quatch!

You are inferring things from my posts. If people want to infer things, no problem. That doesn't make it so.

BarbaraGordon · 09-17-2008, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

where is this moneybags thing coming from?

Find me a post where I talk about my salary.

Come now, you would never resort to salary references. That would be far too obvious and spoil all the fun.

creekster · 09-17-2008, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

Sass-quatch!

You are inferring things from my posts. If people want to infer things, no problem. That doesn't make it so.

Not drawing an inference, I was trying to tactfully suggest that you have created the perception by belittling others' supposed inability to afford htings. You knew this, of course, but there you have it.

Archaea · 09-17-2008, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by creekster

Not drawing an inference, I was trying to tactfully suggest that you have created the perception by belittling others' supposed inability to afford htings. You knew this, of course, but there you have it.

His "what Moi" approach doesn't work very well.

Go on, sign up DDD, your feigned indignation doesn't work.

TripletDaddy · 09-17-2008, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by creekster

Not drawing an inference, I was trying to tactfully suggest that you have created the perception by belittling others' supposed inability to afford htings. You knew this, of course, but there you have it.

There is only one person who gets that treatment. He who shall not be named.

You are missing the forest for the trees if that is how you are intrepreting those posts. But as I said, if people want to infer (for whatever reason, you claim to not be inferring), then so be it. If you think I am the monopoly guy, then fine, see you at Marvin Gardens.

creekster · 09-17-2008, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripletDaddy

There is only one person who gets that treatment. He who shall not be named.

You are missing the forest for the trees if that is how you are intrepreting those posts. But as I said, if people want to infer (for whatever reason, you claim to not be inferring), then so be it. If you think I am the monopoly guy, then fine, see you at Marvin Gardens.

So fi you are the monoploy guy, then you are roly poly, right? I was saying I think the inference is reasonable but I will take at face value your claim not to intend it.