10-31-2008, 06:37 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
I would give you negative feedback for this unprovoked attack on my wife's honor...but truth be told, I have given everybody negative feedback and now I only get a cryptic pop-up that says that I must spread more feedback around before I can give it again.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
10-31-2008, 06:40 PM | #22 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
you parade your wife around here
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
10-31-2008, 06:42 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,016
|
Quote:
And the fact that once Boys Scouts of Canada removed all prohibitions the Gay man NEVER formed a troop because his ONLY purpose for suing was to to advance the gay agenda -- that's fear mongering? How about the fact that the church in Canada nearly eliminated Scouting completely due to the ruling -- that's not relevant? |
|
10-31-2008, 06:42 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Amazing that I have the time, given that I am so busy parading my kids around here, too.
If, by "parade," you mean post a link to a hot video of my wife trotting around the office in a miniskirt, then I think you are wrong. I have never done that.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
10-31-2008, 06:45 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
The Boy Scouts are not protected under the First Amednment like religions are protected. The Church dropped the boy scouts (an unrelated entity) because it didnt want to have gay scoutmasters, not because there was a risk of the Church being forced to perform gay marriages as part of its religious practice. The Church cannot control how the BSA is operated, so it chose to disassociate.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
10-31-2008, 06:48 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eastern Salt Lake County
Posts: 544
|
I found this funny. I'm not in CA, but I guess I have to assume the No on Prop 8 campaign is 100% truthful and scaremongering is simply not a part of their tactics.
|
10-31-2008, 06:50 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Quote:
What do you mean by negative feedback? Is that a board functionality thing? |
|
10-31-2008, 06:52 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,016
|
Quote:
|
|
10-31-2008, 06:52 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eastern Salt Lake County
Posts: 544
|
|
10-31-2008, 06:53 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
I can cite loads of things the Yes on Prop 8 group has predicted.....a few months ago, there was a pamphlet talking about an attack on democracy itself if Prop 8 were to fail. Our kids, the Church's tax exempt status, this very thread is wondering if temples would close. That is fearmongering. As far as I know, the No camp has complained of unfair treatment under the law and discrimination. I am open to be educated. Has the No camp predicted horrible things to come in the future if Prop 8 passes?
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|