10-10-2012, 06:16 PM | #21 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
Quote:
|
|
10-10-2012, 06:51 PM | #22 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
Hincapie admits doping here:
http://www.georgehincapie.com/news/S...orge-Hincapie/ No doubt the report will show that Hincapie implicates Armstrong. |
10-10-2012, 09:56 PM | #23 |
I must not tell lies
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,103
|
One thing the articles don't address is when Armstrong allegedly doped. I'm curious if it was only towards the end of his career, or throughout? Have you heard elsewhere what the timeframe was?
Pre-cancer, he placed 6th in the 1996 Olympic time trial in Atlanta. I wonder if it goes that far back. |
10-11-2012, 12:48 AM | #24 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
I've heard that Hincapie's affidavit is devastating. Haven't read it yet.
|
10-11-2012, 02:05 AM | #25 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
Mike, you really can't be that much a simpleton to not understand how rogue prosecutors can manipulate the system and even witnesses, are you?
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
10-11-2012, 03:08 AM | #26 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
Quote:
Only a willfully depraved person would believe at this point that Lance didn't dope. |
|
10-11-2012, 02:57 PM | #27 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
The report details all the witness intimidation that Armstrong engaged in.
Yet we are to believe that Armstrong is the innocent do-gooder, and it is the USADA that is doing all the witness intimidation. |
10-11-2012, 08:20 PM | #28 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
What's the point? Lance is not racing in cycling. I see no purpose and believe Lance probably competed as all other cyclists did. But he never tested positive so he kept it within the controls of the time. For the USADA to reach back trying to apply new technology and to seek other sanctions is unconscionable. There is no malum per se in seeking a competitive advantage.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
10-11-2012, 08:37 PM | #29 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
see, more distortion from you. Lance was in fact still competing (triathlons). And these sanctions ban Lance from the sport for life (can't own or coach a team). Get the unconfessed cheaters out of the sport. Like Pete Rose.
Lance could work to change and improve the sport by fighting against PEDs. Instead, he is the Godfather of PEDs. His last defense will be "but I raised money for cancer." |
10-12-2012, 03:13 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,484
|
Quote:
Should the feds have ignored Al Capone b/c his misdeeds were in the past and he had left the crime business? Your logic is nuts. There actually is no logic there but some misplaced emotion for a bully. Maybe you take PEDs; don't know. But your devotion to Lance, and dumb arguments in his favor, are odd.
__________________
"Now I say that I know the meaning of my life: 'To live for God, for my soul.' And this meaning, in spite of its clearness, is mysterious and marvelous. Such is the meaning of all existence." Levin, Anna Karenina, Part 8, Chapter 12 |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|