08-06-2008, 09:54 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
|
"We've" never established that... You keep saying that hoping it will be true.
__________________
Its all about the suit |
08-06-2008, 10:11 PM | #22 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Link?
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
08-06-2008, 10:14 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
|
You want a link showing that we've never argued it?
Give me a link that shows that you're not a gay leprechaun wearing a man-shaped robot suit first. THEN we'll give you a link that shows we've never established that the church has no doctrine.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
08-06-2008, 10:19 PM | #24 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
I want a link showing LDS doctrine. Is this it?
http://www.amazon.com/Mormon-Doctrin...8061109&sr=1-2
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
08-06-2008, 10:21 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Quote:
http://www.lds.org/languages/youthma...eFaith_000.pdf Last edited by pelagius; 08-06-2008 at 10:25 PM. |
|
08-06-2008, 10:21 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Or this: http://scriptures.lds.org/en/a_of_f/1
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
|
08-06-2008, 10:30 PM | #27 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
08-06-2008, 10:32 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
I don't think obscure means what you think it means (hint, published in the last 30 years does not equal obscure).
Also, it does answer your Jehovah question but, of course, you would have to read it to find that out. Last edited by pelagius; 08-06-2008 at 10:36 PM. |
08-06-2008, 10:36 PM | #29 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscure
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
08-06-2008, 10:43 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
|
So you think it is too obscure. Others will argue it is too specific. Or too narrow, or broad.
But you're not arguing whether or not it is obscure. You're arguing that it doesn't exist. That means you don't get to quibble over its qualitative value. You're going to have to stare at it and tell me it isn't there.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
seattle ute has pms, seattle ute has wisdom, seattle ute is a douche, su is an apologist, su is closet homosexual, su still grasps at straws, su's guilty conscience |
|
|