07-26-2007, 08:25 PM | #11 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Here's his bio.
He's in the history department. http://history.byu.edu/fac/hamblin/hamblin.htm He earned his Phd at Michigan, usually considered a reputable university. William J. Hamblin (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is Associate Professor of History at Brigham Young University.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα Last edited by Archaea; 07-26-2007 at 08:27 PM. |
07-26-2007, 08:26 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
That's not true of all BYU teachers, much to my dismay. My Greek mythology teacher stops to make connections at the drop of the hat. Sometimes it is interesting or significant-- pointing out that Dionysus is similar in many ways to Christ, for example-- but more often than not, it is somewhat obtrusive to the study of mythology.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος Last edited by All-American; 07-26-2007 at 09:56 PM. |
|
07-26-2007, 08:31 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I can appreciate your reasons for objecting to FARMS-type research, SU, and I frankly agree with many of your observations in that regard. I am nevertheless unaware of any evidence indicating that Dr. Hamblin has been guilty of those kinds of offenses.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος Last edited by All-American; 07-26-2007 at 08:34 PM. |
|
07-26-2007, 08:38 PM | #14 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
What evidence is there that the Egyptians worshipped the God of Judeo-Christianity? From what I can tell, almost none.
What does it matter if their temple worship had some vague similarities, if they were worshipping Athena and Zeus (substitute your favorite Egyptian Gods). |
07-26-2007, 08:40 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
That's not the point.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
|
07-26-2007, 08:42 PM | #16 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
One allegation about our current temple rituals are that they possess some ancient character. The parallels between our current rituals and those of Ancient Egypt highlight the possibility that they may in fact be derived from ancient sources, not that the temple is a remake of Ancient Egyptian temple rites.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
07-26-2007, 08:43 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Not that it matters but I would describe Hamblin as writing quite a lot for FARMS but maybe that is subjective. He has been in the Review of Books a lot (I have read plenty of reviews by him and often found them quite interesting and good); Also, wasn't Hamblin the author of the Review that had the infamous "Metcalfe is a butthead" acrostic in a pre-publication version?
Last edited by pelagius; 07-26-2007 at 08:45 PM. |
07-26-2007, 08:46 PM | #18 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
Is there any ancient religious building (not talking about stonehenge) that would not have some resemblence to LDS temples?
My point is that if you are looking for connections, then you will find them. I think the only one that we need concern ourselves about are the ancient Jewish temples. And in some ways they are so different from our temples, that we need concern ourselves about them either. We have our own thing. There is a temple ruin on the island of Pohnpei. I don't know if it has any similarity with ancient Jewish temples, but who knows. |
07-26-2007, 08:46 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Here is one review he has done, with a couple of paragraphs quoted here to give an example of his type of scholarship: http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?id=126&table=review Quetzalcoatl Since the early twentieth century, many Latter-day Saints have posited some type of relationship between the Mesoamerican god Quetzalcoatl ("feathered serpent;" Kukulcan in Maya) and the resurrected Savior in the Americas. The Tanners briefly deal with this issue (pp. 8-9, 69-70). If there is any relationship between Quetzalcoatl and Christ, it is clearly overlaid with numerous historical, mythical, and legendary strata, which are essentially impossible to unravel.51 Any proposed relationship must therefore remain tentative and speculative, but potentially interesting.52 A few points should be emphasized. First, the Book of Mormon makes no reference to this deity. The possible relation between Christ and Quetzalcoatl is a speculative interpretation by modern readers. It may or may not be correct. Second, there were at least two major Quetzalcoatls, one being an ancient god, and another a Toltec priest named Ce Acatl Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl. There is confusion between the god and the mortal in Aztec, Spanish, and modern sources. Third, the idea and iconography of a "feathered serpent" god can be traced back to Olmec times (c. 1200-400 B.C.),53 and was widespread in Teotihuacan in the third century A.D. Thus at least some elements of the Quetzalcoatl mythology date back to Book of Mormon times. Fourth, the differences between the Quetzalcoatl myths and the depiction of Christ in the Book of Mormon are unfortunately often ignored by some Latter-day Saint writers. I personally find the Quetzalcoatl parallels interesting but not convincing; but whether they are accurate or not, it has little to do with the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. The only question at issue is the validity of some modern Latter-day Saint interpretations. Izapa Stela 5 ("Tree of Life" Stone) The Tanners go to great length in discussing the so-called "Tree of Life" stela, more accurately known as Izapa Stela 5 (pp. 34-52).54 This is perhaps the best known pre-Columbian monument that has been associated with the Book of Mormon by Latter-day Saints. In dealing with this stela it must be emphasized that the interpretation of iconography is extremely difficult and complex. The same symbols or combinations of symbols can have radically different meanings in different times, places, societies, or to different groups within a single society. We will never know for certain what Izapa Stela 5 meant to its creators. To me the connection with the Book of Mormon is possible, but tenuous.55 But even if Izapa Stela 5 has absolutely nothing to do with the Book of Mormon, the fact that some Latter-day Saint have misinterpreted it provides no evidence against the Book of Mormon. Fraudulent Artifacts The Tanners present a number of examples of supposedly forged antiquities which some Latter-day Saints have at various times used in an attempt to bolster the authenticity of the Book of Mormon.56 Several general observations need to be made here. First, the forgery of antiquities is an ancient and "venerable" occupation; it is not particularly linked to the Book of Mormon. Forged coins and pottery are the most notorious examples, as any visitor to the Near East can testify. Forging Viking antiquities has been a favorite pastime of North Americans, but none of these forgeries has ever been taken as evidence that real Norsemen never did discover America.57 Second, none of the supposed forgeries used to authenticate the Book of Mormon were the work of Latter-day Saints. Latter-day Saint writers who accepted the authenticity of these forgeries were sincere victims, rather than perpetrators of the fraud.58 Third, these forgeries are usually accepted only by zealous but uninformed Latter-day Saints. For the most part, trained professional Latter-day Saint scholars have rejected such materials. Fourth, almost none of the forgeries mentioned by the Tanners are at all relevant to current professional Latter-day Saint studies of Book of Mormon antiquities. These studies for the most part do not attempt to authenticate the Book of Mormon by reference to the items discussed by the Tanners. Finally, as I have emphasized before, even if all of the items discussed by the Tanners should in fact be forgeries, it would not disprove the historicity of the Book of Mormon.
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
|
07-26-2007, 08:49 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
εν αρχη ην ο λογος |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|