09-10-2007, 06:53 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
__________________
太初有道 |
|
09-10-2007, 07:28 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bluth Home
Posts: 3,877
|
No. I read that to mean that Jesus may be called Father and Son for the reasons stated. I don't read it to mean that the Father is also the Son.
__________________
The Bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. -Galileo |
09-10-2007, 09:46 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
I just finished reading the article. Hillarious conclusion:
Conclusion I am under no delusion that this paper will persuade Latter-day Saints to abandon or adjust their viewpoint. I also expect that many evangelicals will balk at embracing my arguments. Ironically, both sides may take solace in mutually disagreeing with me. That would be fine. What is more important in my mind is to clearly articulate the text and to contextualize the Hebrew Bible on its own terms. I leave the Spirit to work in each heart as he sees fit.
__________________
太初有道 |
Bookmarks |
|
|