cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2008, 12:08 PM   #11
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RC Vikings View Post
It may come down to who can say the least until November. After Bush the Dems should win going away but Obama and Clinton have proven they can't keep out of their own way. This throws it back to McCain and every time he talks he loses a little more of the conversative base. It's time for all three campaigns to shut it down, it may improve their numbers.
I would have thought the conversative base would appreciate him talking.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:19 PM   #12
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
He lost nearly a third of the vote to candidates who aren't even running! People actually woke up, drove to the polls and voted for people who can't possibly be the nominee anymore. That IS a negative.
As I said. Priceless spin.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:27 PM   #13
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
As I said. Priceless spin.
I think you may struggle to understand the difference between fact and spin.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:38 PM   #14
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
I think you may struggle to understand the difference between fact and spin.
Percentage of PA primary won by George W. Bush in 2000? 72%
Percentage of PA primary won by Al Gore in 2000? 74%
Percentage of PA primary won by John Kerry in 2004? 74%

Heh.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young

Last edited by Tex; 04-28-2008 at 01:43 PM.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:57 PM   #15
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Percentage of PA primary won by George W. Bush in 2000? 72%
Percentage of PA primary won by Al Gore in 2000? 74%
Percentage of PA primary won by John Kerry in 2004? 74%

Heh.
Bush lost PA in 2000. And Gore and Kerry struggled to win PA in both years, despite the fact that it is a traditional Dem stronghold (not to mention that turnout was much higher in this election than in 2000 with 216,000 voting against McCain in 2008 compared to 160,000 against Bush in 2000, with 145,000 of those going to McCain).

Last edited by Cali Coug; 04-28-2008 at 02:01 PM.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 02:14 PM   #16
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Bush lost PA in 2000. And Gore and Kerry struggled to win PA in both years, despite the fact that it is a traditional Dem stronghold.
PA primary, 1992, Bill Clinton: 57%
PA primary, 1992, George Bush: 76%

I couldn't find the percentages, but Reagan didn't even win PA in the 1980 primary.

Also, I finally bothered to have a look at the 2008 PA results, and 16% of the vote went to Ron Paul.

Ron Paul.

You can't seriously use Ron Paul voters as representative of the conservative Republican base and McCain's "troubles." In fact, it's really hard to see how this result is predictive of anything at all.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."

- Cali Coug

"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."

- Brigham Young

Last edited by Tex; 04-28-2008 at 02:16 PM.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 02:19 PM   #17
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
The media is so enjoying the prolonged Dem race that they haven't stopped to notice that McCain only received 73% of the vote in the Republican primary. 27% of Pennsylvanians (over 200,000 voters) went to the polls just to vote AGAINST the guy who was guaranteed to win the nomination.

Republicans are going to be sorely disappointed in November. Particularly those like Myboynoah who think the Dems are throwing this thing away.
There is a difference between a send a message vote and voting for Barak or Hillary vs McCain. If you think the 27% that didn't vote for McCain are going to vote for a democrat, you are dreaming.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 02:57 PM   #18
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
There is a difference between a send a message vote and voting for Barak or Hillary vs McCain. If you think the 27% that didn't vote for McCain are going to vote for a democrat, you are dreaming.
Vote for a Dem? No. Stay home? Yes.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 02:58 PM   #19
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
PA primary, 1992, Bill Clinton: 57%
PA primary, 1992, George Bush: 76%

I couldn't find the percentages, but Reagan didn't even win PA in the 1980 primary.

Also, I finally bothered to have a look at the 2008 PA results, and 16% of the vote went to Ron Paul.

Ron Paul.

You can't seriously use Ron Paul voters as representative of the conservative Republican base and McCain's "troubles." In fact, it's really hard to see how this result is predictive of anything at all.
It isn't Paul that should cause concern, I agree. It is the vote that went to Huckabee.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 03:00 PM   #20
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
Vote for a Dem? No. Stay home? Yes.
Possibly, however I think 99% of the threat to stay home are empty. If the dems were running an Evan Bayh or even Joe Biden, you might be right.

What will energize the republicans to go out and vote are Hillary or Barak, especially Barak. I am not a big fan of McCain's. However, I will send him money, especially if Obama is the democratic candidate. The guy is plain out a scary liberal who talks out both side of his mouth. He does it very well by the way.

Last edited by BYU71; 04-28-2008 at 03:03 PM.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.