05-17-2007, 08:58 PM | #1 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
I think Harold Bloom reads my posts
Interesting article by Bloom that looks at Joseph Smith and the thread from him to the modern church. I wish it were longer.
I have been arguing against our movement towards traditional Christianity for a long time. I am the anti-Jay Santos. Jay sees the future as Joel Osteen. I see the future as the King Follett discourse. http://www.sunstoneonline.com/magazi.../145/18-19.pdf I am reminded of the talk that a person in my ward gave. He started off by saying "We are not Christians. And we should be proud of it." It was a great talk. The point is that we should embrace that which makes us different. Because if we don't, we will not be different. And that will be the end of the church. |
05-17-2007, 09:04 PM | #2 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Quote:
Quote:
P.S The article is only two pages long so the Sunstone smell won't even get on you if you read it. Last edited by pelagius; 05-17-2007 at 09:09 PM. |
||
05-17-2007, 09:07 PM | #3 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
basically Bloom is saying that the teachings of Smith were revolutionary, so much so, that we are a religion apart.
But the current trend is to try and minimize our differences and hope for mainstream acceptance. I HATE this. So it comes down to whether you think Smith was revolutionary or not. |
05-17-2007, 09:31 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
|
|
05-17-2007, 09:39 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Sure, and The Angel and Beehive: THE MORMON STRUGGLE WITH ASSIMILATION by Armand L. Mauss makes a similar argument from a sociological perspective as compared to White's theological perspective. Still, I think Bloom's framing of the issue is pretty good and different than White or Mauss.
|
05-17-2007, 09:40 PM | #6 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
Quote:
It was self-generated in my case, not from reading the thoughts of others. |
|
05-17-2007, 11:05 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Okay, MW, I am going to take a shot at a more substantial commentary on the article. I certainly agree with Bloom when he says, "What [Joseph Smith] most distinctly was not was another American Protestant revivalist." So, yes, I do see Joseph Smith as a revolutionary. Also, I really don't care that much if people consider me Christian. It doesn't bother me if the label is used to refer to those who accept creedal Christianity and excludes people like me who simply accept Jesus as the Messiah but do not accept the 4th century creeds.
I think that Bloom overstates the gulf between Joseph Smith's theology and creedal Christianity. Sure, there are some substantial and even revolutionary differences, but Bloom overstates the gulf (misunderstands the gulf?) in my view when he paints Joseph Smith as henotheistic. Sure, Joseph Smith believed in deification (other forms of Christianity have notions of deification) and some people suggest he believed in an infinite regress of Gods (although I am honestly not sure that is true). Still, I don't think Joseph Smith ever really rejected something like trinitarianism (it seems to be me there is strong correlation between social trinitarianism and Joseph Smith's thought). Sure, you can argue for henotheistic elements, but if you do so to the exclusion of other more traditional Christian elements then I think you distort the true distance between creedal christianity and Joseph Smith's theology. Furthermore, it really exaggerates the difference between Mormon Theology today and Joseph Smith's theology. Last edited by pelagius; 05-17-2007 at 11:32 PM. |
05-17-2007, 11:10 PM | #8 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,368
|
Our theology is closing down, and not expanding like it was in Joseph Smith's era.
The light of theological revelation really ended after Joseph. Can any arguments (historical not polemic) that subsequent prophets were "visionary men"? Pelagius I think you are arguing that multiple Gods doesn't play a large practical role in Mormon religion. I grant that it doesn't play a day-to-day role. But the fabric of that doctrine, God as man, men as God, introduces a far richer fabric of the universe than what exists in Christianity, and I think that is what enchants Bloom. And of course, many believers. |
05-17-2007, 11:24 PM | #9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by pelagius; 05-17-2007 at 11:27 PM. |
||
05-17-2007, 11:25 PM | #10 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
Gone are the theologians, the philosophers and the visionaries. Perhaps in leading millions vision is no longer necessary, but the vision was gravitas needed to get the rough stone rolling. Our current leaders are caretakers, not motivators.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|