12-07-2006, 06:45 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Productivity Stats
I run NBA productivity stats and compare with averages at each position. This is how guys are ranking comparing their NBA productivity per 40 minutes to a baseline average for their position.
Really good: Keena, Cummard, Ainge Kinda good: Balderson, Malaman, Burgess Kinda bad: Plaisted Really bad: Broadus, Vuk, Rose, Tavernari, Murdock |
12-07-2006, 06:49 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
P.S. I think a decent way to interpret this is that if everybody was average, we would have expected to win half the games we had played over the time period evaluated.
|
12-07-2006, 11:33 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
|
Quote:
Last edited by pelagius; 12-07-2006 at 11:38 PM. |
|
12-08-2006, 01:40 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
Interestingly enough, a little better last year but not drastically.
End of last year, I would have put it like this. Really good: Balderson, Reichner, Young Kinda good: Cummard, Malaman Kinda bad: Plaisted, Broadus, Ainge, Rose, Dawes, Really bad: none Plaisted individually last year Good: #FT, Avg: Points, FG %, FT %, Rebounding, Assists, TO's Bad: Blocks, Steals This year Good: Off Rebounds, Avg: everything else Bad: Assists, Steals, Blocks |
Bookmarks |
|
|