10-27-2008, 05:13 PM | #81 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
It's a method of inquiry, that is all. It doesn't really seek to solve any questions but adds more questions.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
10-27-2008, 05:28 PM | #82 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bluth Home
Posts: 3,877
|
Are we debating what "knowledge" is again?
Tooblue is persuaded by the evidence. He calls that state of being knowledge. Archaea thinks knowledge is too strong a term for when one is persuaded by the evidence. Does that about sum it up? "Know" is not the word I would use either, but in the context of our cultural construct I don't begrudge tooblue the use of it. I know what he means. Or if I think he is deluding himself, what of it?
__________________
The Bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. -Galileo |
10-27-2008, 05:28 PM | #83 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
I think it's more of a means of artisitic expression than anything else. Maybe an outlook. At most it's a philosophical perspective. I wouldn't call it an empirical method of inquiry.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
10-27-2008, 05:35 PM | #84 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
It's an outlook, and a method or reexamination, but it's not limited to artistic expression, as it often focuses upon the limits of expression.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
10-27-2008, 05:36 PM | #85 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|