cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2008, 07:17 AM   #1
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default Can someone define 'the rich'?

It appears the Democratic is hell bent on taxing the rich. And I've heard the rich being defined as those making over $250K, $100K and $85K. What does Saint Obama consider rich and does that mean the rest of the citizenry won't pay more taxes?
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 11:13 AM   #2
il Padrino Ute
Board Pinhead
 
il Padrino Ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
il Padrino Ute is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

The definition for rich is whatever those who want to increase expensive social programs says it is.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver

"This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB.
il Padrino Ute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 12:42 PM   #3
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exUte View Post
It appears the Democratic is hell bent on taxing the rich. And I've heard the rich being defined as those making over $250K, $100K and $85K. What does Saint Obama consider rich and does that mean the rest of the citizenry won't pay more taxes?
$250K+ and yes.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 02:24 PM   #4
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default That's the problem. The 'rich' benchmark

Quote:
Originally Posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
The definition for rich is whatever those who want to increase expensive social programs says it is.
will be lowered until EVERYONE's taxes go up.........
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 02:27 PM   #5
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default You're saying everyone earning less than

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
$250K+ and yes.
$250K, won't see an increase in taxes? Wow. Have you ever seen a comparison of taxes under Clinton vs. Bush (after Bush's tax reduction). After all, the key issue is whether to eliminate Bush's tax cuts in 2010.

I'll post the comparison later. Perhaps then you will see who your party deems rich.
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 02:35 PM   #6
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exUte View Post
$250K, won't see an increase in taxes? Wow. Have you ever seen a comparison of taxes under Clinton vs. Bush (after Bush's tax reduction). After all, the key issue is whether to eliminate Bush's tax cuts in 2010.

I'll post the comparison later. Perhaps then you will see who your party deems rich.
Clinton did raise taxes on the middle class. His economics team believed that deficit reduction was necessary to hold interest rates down, so he had to hold of on the middle class tax cut until the bills were paid. Obama's team doesn't believe that deficits affect the interest rate that much, and hence isn't as focused on deficit reduction.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 03:15 PM   #7
exUte
Senior Member
 
exUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
exUte can only hope to improve
Default Good points.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCoug View Post
Clinton did raise taxes on the middle class. His economics team believed that deficit reduction was necessary to hold interest rates down, so he had to hold of on the middle class tax cut until the bills were paid. Obama's team doesn't believe that deficits affect the interest rate that much, and hence isn't as focused on deficit reduction.
Not sure which side I come down on. But if Obama's team is wrong, watch out.
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere
exUte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.