11-09-2011, 09:15 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Ehrman's scholarship a result of personal suffering?
Quote:
My contention with Bart is that he’s a fundamentalist — someone who is unwilling to process an issue in any other way than the black-and-white, either-or fallacy that he himself has framed. I’m sympathetic to him only in the sense that some acute personal suffering appears to be behind his fundamentalism. While I wish there was something I could do to help in that regard, I also have to be honest and say that it seems quite clear that Bart’s personal pain has skewered his scholarship. He’s human.
My greater irritation is the way the masses (aided and abetted by a pathologically ignorant media) swallow whatever Bart says as though its some grand, now self-evident discovery, or think that no one can be looking at the same data and still believe in the reality of the Christ of the gospels. Wrong on both counts. There are many scholars who do what Bart does (textual criticism, New Testament studies) who draw conclusions contrary to Ehrman’s and, more importantly, are capable of judging his method and scholarship.
|
Way to fool the masses.
http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBi...11-a-response/
__________________
太初有道
Last edited by ChinoCoug; 11-09-2011 at 09:18 PM.
Reason: forgot link
|
|
|