Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex
This just gets more bizarre. On CNN, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs has again commented on the presumed guilt of KSM, saying this:
If the White House is out there practically guaranteeing both the outcome and the sentence, what is the purpose of trying them in a civil court in the first place?
I thought the reason we were doing this is to "show the world" how American jurisprudence works: habeas corpus, presumption of innocence, due process, etc. All of this is out the window. What you have here is an American show trial.
This is so amateurish it's embarrassing.
|
He didn't "guarantee" a verdict. He said "likely" which sounds about right.
For a trial to be fair, you don't need a 50% chance of acquittal. You do realize that, right?