![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Why do you believe the number is far too high? Secondly, what do you believe the number is? Working in the health care industry, at least incidentally, I don't believe the big numbers politicians quote. But a follow up question, what portion of whatever the number is attributable to choice, i.e., college kids risking it to save a few bucks, versus those who are uninsured because of uninsurability or unaffordability? Now, if you're honest, you'll have to admit we have no idea what the number of uninsured is who are uninsured by choice versus the other subcategory. And if we can't determine what the number is with any reasonable degree of confidence, how can we say it's too high? But let's move another step, let's assume that the number of uninsurables for cost or coverage is 8 million persons, a lot of persons. Quote:
These are two assumptions which liberals make but I don't see proof of it. I see many factors in our international competitiveness, but health care? In many of the countries, such as Brazil, China and India, which are hurting our economic base, they don't grand social contracts for health care. You'll have to make a good argument that is hurting us. Quote:
What if this is the primary reason, combined with the impossible to satiate appetite for health care on demand? Nobody even studies these lifestyles angles, because they don't yield political results which give more power to politicians. Politics is about gaining power and if one can't get power from an issue then you ignore issues such as the ones highlighted.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|