Supreme Court rules corporate contributions can't be limited

[Tex]

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

Yes, I did note the concurring opinion. I didn't say they would try to defend it on the grounds of originalism, I said it isn't defensible on the grounds of originalism (a point which is true whether or not they tried to do it).

Heh. You didn't read it first, did you.

Originally Posted by Cali Coug

My argument on originalism, by the way, isn't that "originalism isn't perfect, ergo it's results-oriented." I am pretty confident you already know that, given that "we're retreading old discussions" here, so I will chalk this up as a dishonest attack and move on.

Chalk it up to whatever you want, that's exactly how I view your position.