08-23-2008, 10:01 PM | #11 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
As I've said here previously, my support for gay marriage is rooted in the common sense fact that gays do not choose to be gay. They have also expressed the same desire and ability as heterosexuals to hold down monogomous relationships and raise children. Do you doubt either of these propositions? I really doubt that gays would inflict any more damage on marriage than heterosexuals have. Marriage seems to have survived the greatest possible threat--no fault divorce. Yes, this is about one word. The LDS Church does not approve of civil unions but drawing the line there would be a hopeless waste of political calital, and cpunterproductive. The purpose of calling gay civil unions marriage is to legitimatize their life style, to put their families on the same civic footing as families headed by heterosexuals. Civil unions are precisely analogous to separate but equal. This is admittedly ultimately about values. We all have a dog in this fight. Our very souls are at stake. It's the immutability of homosexuality that gives this issue a powerful moral dimension. I am not the kind of person who asks questions like, why did God make gays? But to those who do, how about this: God made gays to provide possibly the ultimate test of our ability not just to tolerate but to celebrate diversity. Learning that lesson seems to me what the drama of human existence has been about, after we provide for our necessities, and perhaps the reason we are on earth.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|