Homosexual marriage... - cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

non sequitur · 05-29-2006, 06:45 AM

I don't have a problem with the Church taking a stand on a social issue, but I do find it more than a little ironic that a church whose very foundation was built upon a perverted notion of marriage, is now making itself the spokesman for what comprises a socially acceptable marriage (kind of like Nathan Lane telling us what it means to be a "man"). Which is more socially a repugnant: a man with one male partner or a man with 30 female partners? If you're being intellectually honest, the answer is easy.

05-29-2006, 06:45 AM	#12
non sequitur Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 1,964	I don't have a problem with the Church taking a stand on a social issue, but I do find it more than a little ironic that a church whose very foundation was built upon a perverted notion of marriage, is now making itself the spokesman for what comprises a socially acceptable marriage (kind of like Nathan Lane telling us what it means to be a "man"). Which is more socially a repugnant: a man with one male partner or a man with 30 female partners? If you're being intellectually honest, the answer is easy. __________________ ...You've been under attack for days, there's a soldier down, he's wounded, gangrene's setting in, 'Who's used all the penicillin?' 'Oh, Mark Paxson sir, he's got knob rot off of some tart.'" - Gareth Keenan Last edited by non sequitur; 05-29-2006 at 06:48 AM.