10-28-2008, 04:56 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
See, now I don't get this. How come over-sexed is "highly sexually active," but undersexed is not a failure to get any action? I'm going to write these people. They need to update their definition.
(I've convinced Merriam-Webster to adjust a definition before. On second thought I prolly shouldn't brag about that.) and Solon, you're really asking for it calling Archaea into this thread. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|