01-22-2010, 10:51 PM | #41 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
Patience, grasshopper. Quote:
Wow, that is one hilarious read. "But that effort fizzled when support for it didn’t materialize, insiders said." Gee, wonder why. Must be those crazy stupid senators more afraid of the media than the "zero" evidence that the electorate hates this bill! And this: Quote:
And then this gem: Quote:
Good stuff, Cali. I really should read Kos more, and you really should read it less.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
||||
01-22-2010, 11:52 PM | #42 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-23-2010, 12:05 AM | #43 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
Quote:
Reading E. J. Dionne's explanation just makes me think, "Man, these guys are panicking." Certainly doesn't exude confidence.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
||
01-23-2010, 12:24 AM | #44 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-25-2010, 12:07 AM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
To respond to your earlier requests, here are a few reasons--absent exit polling--that I think the Massachusettes election revolved around more than just local politics: - Brown repeatedly and loudly campaigned on being the 41st vote to kill health care. It was the single most memorable thing about his campaign, except perhaps his truck. He repeatedly mocked the "back room" deals that were then on-going. - Brown specifically campaigned against Obama's approach to terrorism, particularly giving them lawyers and Miranda rights - Brown specifically campaigned against Obama's approach to taxes - Obama came and personally campaigned for Coakley, and he studiously avoided mentioning his health care bill - Though Obama remains personally popular, a plurality of MA voters opposed his health care bill (PPP: 40% for, 48% against) - The Democrats constantly referred to health care as Kennedy's life's work, and appealed to voters to elect Coakley to preserve the chance to "pass it for Ted". Kennedy's widow specifically made this clarion call. - 56% of voters named health care as the most important issue, though Coakley won more of those voters, 53-46% (Rasmussen) - 78% of Brown voters said their vote was intended to stop health care (Rasmussen) I think it's crystal clear that Obama's policies--particularly health care--played a significant role in what happened on Tuesday, and Dems ignore that at their peril (fine with me, BTW). Evan Bayh was subsequently quoted as saying, "If you lose Massachusetts and that’s not a wake-up call, there’s no hope of waking up." The reasons in VA and NJ are similar, though not as pronounced as MA: - Obama spent a significant amount of time campaigning for both Democrats, far more than Coakley's one-day visit - 40% of VA voters said their view of Obama factored into their choice, roughly split between support and opposition - Both elections took place not long after weeks of media attention on anti-health-care town hall meetings - During the campaigns, both Republican candidates continually linked their Democratic counterparts to Obama and to Congressional Democrats Other evidence common to all three: independents, who were crucial to Obama's decisive victory, fled the Democrats in all three elections ... by a 2-1 margin in VA and NJ, and a 3-1 margin in MA. To me, that's an indicator that transcends local politics. In addition, it has become increasingly clear that Obama is unable to transfer his personal popularity to other candidates. He's becoming the Sports Illustrated kiss-of-death of national politics. You will almost surely interpret this data differently than me, and that's fine. But to say it doesn't exist ("zero evidence") is to put one's head in the sand. I read Robert Gibbs telling Chris Wallace today that in the MA election, "More people voted to express support for Obama than to oppose him." That's just delusional, finger-in-the-ears, "I can't hear you" sort of stuff. Of course, Obama gets that luxury because he has 3 years to go. House Democrats don't.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
01-25-2010, 02:59 AM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
As even the evidence you cited suggests, those who cared most about health care voted against Brown and for Coakley. Given that this is obviously the biggest domestic issue on people's radar today, that isn't a small point- particularly if you are trying to make the case that the election was a referendum on Democrats and health care. If it were a referendum on health care as you argue, the people who most care about it voted and spoke- a majority support health care. How does that support your claim? Most of the rest of your evidence is that Scott Brown campaigned for or against certain things which are associated with the Democratic party. Sure, he did. Am I to believe, then, that most voters thought he would be in favor of the Democratic party platform one month before the election? Because a month before the election, he was down 30 points in the polls. Did people's opinions change to the tune of 35 points in one month on fairly significant issues, even though there was almost no change or news regarding any of those issues at all in that month period? If people didn't like those positions at all, wouldn't they automatically default to supporting the Republican as opposed to the Democrat one month before the election? Even if you know absolutely nothing about either candidate, if the issues you cited were highly important to people, why start with the presumption that you favor the Democrat? Or are you suggesting that his arguments were so persuasive a full 35% of voters changed their mind on those issues in a one month span? We can at least agree that the data points in Virginia and New Jersey are even less useful in finding a conclusion that voters were rejecting Obama or the Democratic party. Where we disagree is on your statement that "Obama spent a significant amount of time campaigning for both Democrats, far more than Coakley's one-day visit." For Deeds, Obama spent two days campaigning for the candidate- once in August, once in October. I suppose that is a 100% increase over his time with Coakley, but to call 2 days "significant" seems like a huge stretch. As for Corzine, I have found news of 3 visits by Obama over a five month span (it isn't as if Obama was thrilled with Corzine either, as the WH approached the NJ Senate President and asked him to run instead of Corzine in July of 2009). |
|
01-25-2010, 01:41 PM | #47 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
A person opposing Obama on health care may support another issue, i.e., economic issues, as a higher priority. This may be why they oppose Obama, he's picking a horrible time to spend more money on a less important issue. OTOH, the liberals who ignore government expenditure issues think it's a hot button item where they don't care about spending other people's money.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
01-25-2010, 02:15 PM | #48 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
|
|
01-25-2010, 05:02 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Here's what Chris Matthews (that rabid right-winger) thinks of reconciliation. The video is priceless.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...ering-netroots If the R's can find a decent candidate for the 8th district, there's no way Grayson survives 2010.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
01-25-2010, 05:08 PM | #50 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|