cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Religion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2007, 05:32 PM   #1
FMCoug
Senior Member
 
FMCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kaysville, UT
Posts: 3,151
FMCoug
Default Will Boyd K. Packer ever be the President of the church?

The discussion of Packers' arch conservative stances lately have got me thinking. With where President Hinckley has taken the church in terms of PR, etc, and the likelihood for Monson to continue that pattern, it would seem to be that Packer would be a huge step backwards if he is ever prophet.

He and Monson are about the same age I think (in fact Packer is a few years older IIRC) so it's not out of reason to expect Monson to outlive Packer.

OTOH, people said the same thinga bout ETB but the concerns were proved to be unfounded. The mantle of prophet seemed to really tame him.
FMCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:35 PM   #2
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FMCoug View Post
The discussion of Packers' arch conservative stances lately have got me thinking. With where President Hinckley has taken the church in terms of PR, etc, and the likelihood for Monson to continue that pattern, it would seem to be that Packer would be a huge step backwards if he is ever prophet.

He and Monson are about the same age I think (in fact Packer is a few years older IIRC) so it's not out of reason to expect Monson to outlive Packer.

OTOH, people said the same thinga bout ETB but the concerns were proved to be unfounded. The mantle of prophet seemed to really tame him.
Ooo, I would love to be on Cougarguard the day that happened. Someone would have to put Arch and SIEQ on suicide watch.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:37 PM   #3
SoonerCoug
Formerly known as MudPhudCoug
 
SoonerCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Land of desolation
Posts: 2,548
SoonerCoug is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FMCoug View Post
The discussion of Packers' arch conservative stances lately have got me thinking. With where President Hinckley has taken the church in terms of PR, etc, and the likelihood for Monson to continue that pattern, it would seem to be that Packer would be a huge step backwards if he is ever prophet.

He and Monson are about the same age I think (in fact Packer is a few years older IIRC) so it's not out of reason to expect Monson to outlive Packer.

OTOH, people said the same thinga bout ETB but the concerns were proved to be unfounded. The mantle of prophet seemed to really tame him.
Monson has type II diabetes, unfortunately. That ought to shorten his lifespan a bit.
SoonerCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:37 PM   #4
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FMCoug View Post
The discussion of Packers' arch conservative stances lately have got me thinking. With where President Hinckley has taken the church in terms of PR, etc, and the likelihood for Monson to continue that pattern, it would seem to be that Packer would be a huge step backwards if he is ever prophet.

He and Monson are about the same age I think (in fact Packer is a few years older IIRC) so it's not out of reason to expect Monson to outlive Packer.

OTOH, people said the same thinga bout ETB but the concerns were proved to be unfounded. The mantle of prophet seemed to really tame him.
If Boyd K. Packer became prophet, it would make the Cougarguard BRM discussions seem like child's play.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:39 PM   #5
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FMCoug View Post
The discussion of Packers' arch conservative stances lately have got me thinking. With where President Hinckley has taken the church in terms of PR, etc, and the likelihood for Monson to continue that pattern, it would seem to be that Packer would be a huge step backwards if he is ever prophet.

He and Monson are about the same age I think (in fact Packer is a few years older IIRC) so it's not out of reason to expect Monson to outlive Packer.

OTOH, people said the same thinga bout ETB but the concerns were proved to be unfounded. The mantle of prophet seemed to really tame him.
We would probably see an ETB effect, lots of concern, but very little actual movement. I still expect Monson to be the next president, but as you state, stranger things occur. Even if it were a period of increased rigidity and decreased tolerance, all things pass in a season.

Monson might be an interesting choice. It could also be a period of going through a few presidents every couple of years.

None of the more senior apostles are young at all. The burden must be extreme.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

Last edited by Archaea; 06-25-2007 at 05:43 PM.
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:41 PM   #6
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default How would it be different than

President Benson or President Smith. The talk might be tougher, but the gospel would stay the same.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:45 PM   #7
FMCoug
Senior Member
 
FMCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kaysville, UT
Posts: 3,151
FMCoug
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
President Benson or President Smith. The talk might be tougher, but the gospel would stay the same.
The gospel would be the same but the "softening" of the message to the world has been beneficial IMO.
FMCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:50 PM   #8
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default I understand that, however in my mind

Quote:
Originally Posted by FMCoug View Post
The gospel would be the same but the "softening" of the message to the world has been beneficial IMO.
there is the PR effort and how the church really operates.

PR wise I would change a lot of things. However, no one asks me and it is fun to discuss, however I sustain whoever ends up the Prophet whether I agree or disagree with them.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:54 PM   #9
SoonerCoug
Formerly known as MudPhudCoug
 
SoonerCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Land of desolation
Posts: 2,548
SoonerCoug is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
there is the PR effort and how the church really operates.

PR wise I would change a lot of things. However, no one asks me and it is fun to discuss, however I sustain whoever ends up the Prophet whether I agree or disagree with them.
Were Packer to become the Prophet, there might just be a bit more "gridlock" in the Quorum of the 12.

One of the greatest examples of how the Quorum of the twelve checks and balances the prophet was Ezra Taft Benson's pride talk, in which the first version included a condemnation of the "evils of organic evolution." That condemnation of "organic evolution" was promptly removed from subsequent versions of the talk--including the print versions. I'm certain his initial statement generated a discussion within the quorum, after which the talk was changed.
SoonerCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 05:58 PM   #10
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoonerCoug View Post
One of the greatest examples of how the Quorum of the twelve checks and balances the prophet was Ezra Taft Benson's pride talk, in which the first version included a condemnation of the "evils of organic evolution." That condemnation of "organic evolution" was promptly removed from subsequent versions of the talk--including the print versions. I'm certain his initial statement generated a discussion within the quorum, after which the talk was changed.
Source?
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.