|
08-14-2008, 07:17 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
|
Can someone define 'the rich'?
It appears the Democratic is hell bent on taxing the rich. And I've heard the rich being defined as those making over $250K, $100K and $85K. What does Saint Obama consider rich and does that mean the rest of the citizenry won't pay more taxes?
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere |
08-14-2008, 11:13 AM | #2 |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
|
The definition for rich is whatever those who want to increase expensive social programs says it is.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
08-14-2008, 02:24 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
|
That's the problem. The 'rich' benchmark
will be lowered until EVERYONE's taxes go up.........
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere |
08-14-2008, 12:42 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
$250K+ and yes.
__________________
太初有道 |
08-14-2008, 02:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
|
You're saying everyone earning less than
$250K, won't see an increase in taxes? Wow. Have you ever seen a comparison of taxes under Clinton vs. Bush (after Bush's tax reduction). After all, the key issue is whether to eliminate Bush's tax cuts in 2010.
I'll post the comparison later. Perhaps then you will see who your party deems rich.
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere |
08-14-2008, 02:35 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
|
Quote:
__________________
太初有道 |
|
08-14-2008, 03:15 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
|
Good points.
Quote:
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|