![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
![]() |
![]() Quote:
#7 I would love to do this for a couple of years while my kids are still young. Get to live in Brazil again but as a teacher. They could give you a small stipend after living expenses. It would be a nice sabattical.
__________________
Its all about the suit |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
![]() |
![]() Quote:
First, I didnt know our missionary program was failing. Second, assuming that it is, why would a greater number of kids go after high school instead of 19 or 21? What is the difference that would make it more successful? What of kids that graduate HS before they turn 18? Send minors out in the peace corps? Third, the primary goal of proselyting is to increase membership through baptism. The primary goal of a peace corp is secular education (health, engineering, basic academics, etc). How would a "mandatory" peace corp stint followed by an optional proselyte stint improve our failing missionary program?
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Norcal
Posts: 5,821
![]() |
![]()
I really liked #3 not because I think our missionary program is failing but because it gives an opportunity for a full day of non-proselytizing service every day. It's a very different kind of service than the mission most of us served, and I think would be an incredible opportunity for any kid that age going forward with an eye toward lifelong service. Following that up with a proselytizing mission would be a very cool experience for anyone who took advantage of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
![]() |
![]()
I might do the opposite way. Proselyte first 18 months. 2nd 18 months service, but it would be gratis in terms of having to pay.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Posts: 2,236
![]() |
![]()
What if a kid could choose between a service mission or a proselyting mission. I bet you would get a lot more kids to go and the goodwill earned would more then make up for the lost proselyting time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Its all about the suit |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
![]() |
![]()
Getting into college after a mission would be a logistical problem. Because you would have to apply while still on your mission. Because I'm not sure most schools would admit you, only to have you enroll 2 - 3 years after your admission.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
![]() |
![]()
How do people do it now? My guess is that they would do it the same way
__________________
Its all about the suit |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
![]() |
![]()
What about non-athletes at Univ. of Utah, do some get admitted, then defer enrollment for 2-3 years? I don't know personally know anyone who did this.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
![]() |
![]()
yes... Half of my highschool deferred admission to college so they could go on mission in september right after they graduated. They all came home and went straight to the U
__________________
Its all about the suit |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|