![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton Township, MI
Posts: 3,126
![]() |
![]()
__________________
Its all about the suit |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
![]() |
![]()
I wonder how much he has to say in his book that hasn't already been said by Dawkins or Harris. I also wonder if he's annoyed that his parents gave him the name Christopher.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
![]() |
![]()
I recently suggested that book for Book of the Month but CatBlue was the only supporter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Board Pinhead
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the basement of my house, Murray, Utah.
Posts: 15,941
![]() |
![]()
Perhaps he changed his name to Christopher from Christian.
__________________
"The beauty of baseball is not having to explain it." - Chuck Shriver "This is now the joke that stupid people laugh at." - Christopher Hitchens on IQ jokes about GWB. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
![]() |
![]()
I read the article. There are some intersting tid bits. I have thought that the parallels between Mormonism and Islam were too close to be accidental, and this is really the first place I've seen evidence that Joseph Smith was actually aware of Muhammad's story and claims, and was consciously inspired by them. Also, it's interesting to know that 27,000 words of the Book of Mormon come straight out of the King James Version of the Bible, and another 2,000 are comprised of "And it came to pass..." (As I recall, thanks to Brodie for these statistics.) That represents a lot of the book's girth
But I must say Hitchins' article is a rather superficial treatment, and needlessly mean spirited. The sardonic tone does nothing to bolster his argument, is in fact quite distracting, and with so much to work with I'm surprised he had to descend to the gutter as he did. Clearly these columnists gain their high falutin reputations a lot like people win high school elections. I'm astonished he didn't address the Book of Abraham, which is low hanging fruit for this type of analysis, and in its own right the discovery of the papyrus, etc. is a facinating story. In a sense the Book of Abraham is the proverbial smoking gun though in my opinion this terminology gives undeserved credit to the Book of Mormon, in a back handed way. He missed a good opportunity to use the Book of Abraham to make his case simply and concretely. It is the only part of the Mormon canon for which we have the original document, and Joseph's translation and the original papyrus are worlds apart, of course. Also, while he notes that 200 of the 350 names in the Book of Mormon are to be found in the Bible, he misses another opportunity in ommitting that most of the leading characters' names and place names are apparently derived from place names around Palmyra (but I learned this just today on CG!). His reference to "Dr. Brodie", who only attained a master's degree, is evidence of a quick and dirty job. A weak effort overall.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 04-29-2007 at 03:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
![]() |
![]()
I did smile at his comment, "Dr. Fawn Brodie, whose 1945 book 'No Man Knows My History' was a good-faith attempt by a professional historian to put the kindest possible interpretation on the relevant 'events.'" I don't know if he was trying to be funny.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Charon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the heart of darkness (Provo)
Posts: 9,564
![]() |
![]()
I am guessing that he has never actually cracked open the book but is basing his entire analysis on a review or two that he has read.
__________________
"... the arc of the universe is long but it bends toward justice." Martin Luther King, Jr. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
![]() |
![]()
Either that or he skimmed, and I really mean skimmed, Brodie's book and that was the sole source of this article. The reason I suspect that may be so is No Man Knows My History came before the discovery of the Book of Abraham papyrus, and he didn't seize on that, as I would have thought he would.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Charon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the heart of darkness (Provo)
Posts: 9,564
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
"... the arc of the universe is long but it bends toward justice." Martin Luther King, Jr. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
![]() |
![]()
I understood you to say he read reviews of Brodie's book. I gave him slightly more credit but not much. IT's still pretty bad if that was his only source, and a secondary one at that. I assume he sprung for the actual book.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|