|
05-23-2008, 04:36 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
"Socializing" oil companies
Maxine Waters in the show-trial hearings of oil executives:
Quote:
http://wizbangblog.com/content/2008/...o-sue-opec.php
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
05-23-2008, 05:49 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
That is totally irrational. Maybe you can give us one of your famous analogies to help clarify. |
|
05-23-2008, 06:07 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
I'll leave the poor analogizing to you.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
05-23-2008, 09:28 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SLC
Posts: 441
|
I will be completely surprised if they do. There could conceivably be an individual or small number of congressmen who try a bill for "the people" to purchase some part of the petroleum industry, but Obama & the overwhelming majority of Dems would push for a windfall tax, nothing more, IMO.
|
05-23-2008, 09:31 PM | #5 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
|
Yeah, they would tax the hell of it, they wouldn't nationalize it.
I just heard a piece on Mexico's national oil company which is in terrible shape. The president of Mex wants for foreign help and investment, but the left (I guess most of Mexico) is against it. This one company's profit provides for 40% of the national govt. budget. So they have spent money instead of reinvesting in equipment and exploration. |
05-23-2008, 09:50 PM | #6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SLC
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
If a windfall tax is levied against the oil companies, and the absolute value of their net profits ends up being on par with what they would have been had the price of oil been, say, $80 per barrell, is this a death blow to an industry? I think not. Quote:
The Russians in particular have double-crossed western oil companies repeatedly, changing the terms of contracts after oil company engineering and technology have proven the feasibility of extracting difficult oil fields. Oil companies take this risk into consideration when they're looking for new oil in foreign lands... yet they're making money hand over fist. I don't feel bad for them, they'll be fine. |
||
05-23-2008, 10:13 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SLC
Posts: 441
|
Biggest factor in oil price inflation / instability
Financial markets work best when there is transparency in the macro-economic numbers, when a nation's appetite for a product, and a supplier's capacity, are more or less predictable.
For a variety of reasons, this is not the case in petroleum. The US demand & supply numbers are fairly transparent & predictable, but the demand & production numbers for China, India, Russia and the OPEC nations are very tough, sometimes impossible to nail down. Most OPEC nations consider their oil inventory & potential find figures to be state secrets (for good reason). All of this leads to wildly divergent estimates on the upcoming price of oil. Estimates of future oil prices range (between knowledgeable & respected analysts) between $85 per barrel and $400-$500 per barrel. Oil companies are in the position of welcoming this kind of instability, as the higher price pads profits accordingly. None of this can be laid at the feet of Dems proposing windfall taxes. |
05-23-2008, 10:26 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Not only is a windfall profits tax clear-cut anti-capitalism, but it also disincentivizes growth. I don't think there's a better way to force the oil companies to turtle down then to pass that silly tax.
Pro-tax people never seem to take into account 2 basic facts: one, companies rarely pay taxes, choosing instead to pass them along to the consumer; two, profit is what drives a capitalist society.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
05-23-2008, 10:39 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Valencia CA
Posts: 1,384
|
[QUOTE=Tex;224937]Not only is a windfall profits tax clear-cut anti-capitalism, but it also disincentivizes growth. I don't think there's a better way to force the oil companies to turtle down then to pass that silly tax.[QUOTE]
Not only does it disincentivize growth it literaly restricts growth given that a firms sustainable growth rate = ROE (Net Income/Equity) x Retention Ratio (% of Net Income not paid in dividends) |
05-24-2008, 01:29 AM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SLC
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
Have airlines been able to increase their net profits by jacking up prices, keeping the same profit margin and shrugging their shoulders as the price of jet fuel has sky-rocketed? No, like just about every other market with high levels of competition they've attempted to keep a lid on their prices and put short term profitability at risk while hoping for better conditions, have made efforts to mitigate that part of their cost structure (made plans to purchase new airplanes, retired airplanes that are 5 years old because they burn too much fuel, etc.) Only recently have airlines had to take extraordinary measure to pass along the costs, while the cost of jet fuel has been steadily climbing for years. What other industries see explosive growth in profits due to inflation in inputs? If the price of beef doubles, does McDonalds see their net profits rise commensurately? No. If a critical memory factory in Taiwan is destroyed by typhoon, does Dell & HP see their profits rise to record levels? Again, no. All of the standard market-worship reactions are fine & good, but the market model assumes related markets are functioning properly. In this case, the market for unrefined petroleum is badly distorted for the reasons I stated above. The demand for gasoline is relatively inelastic... we won't see a rapid 30% drop in the demand for gasoline, in spite of price spikes. The entire economy is at risk of inflation yet Big Oil sits up high on a growing stack of cash, ambivalent about the effects their industry has on the nation. Profits have never been this high, life is grand. It's the ideal scenario, really. Windfall taxes arise as an option when excessive greed emerges, which is exactly what we have now. The threat of windfall profits is a device political leaders can use to encourage more responsible behavior from greedy corporations. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|