|
09-29-2008, 07:57 PM | #1 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
|
The National Review supported the failed bill
Now what for these supposed conservative visionaries?
|
09-29-2008, 08:00 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
|
Problem is.........
there aren't too many other short term solutions.
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere |
09-29-2008, 08:01 PM | #3 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,367
|
See that's the problem. A complex problem, building for many years, and Poulson thinks he can solve it with a 3 page proposal. And we are told there is no alternative, this is the only way to prevent doom.
|
09-29-2008, 08:04 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,326
|
Actually it turned into at least a
Quote:
My suggestion to make it a $200B solution for the short term and then work on putting together a public/private solution. Plus do away with the 'mark to market' regulatory nonsense.
__________________
Ohbama - The Original Bridge to Nowhere |
|
09-29-2008, 11:37 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Jordan, UT
Posts: 1,799
|
That was disappointing. Though, many NR contributors didn't support it.
Dick Armey had a piece in NRO arguing against the bailout: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...jJlYWQ=&w=MA==
__________________
WWPD? |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|